Crime and Justice Drug Courts in NSW †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Crime and Justice Drug Courts in NSW. Answer: Introduction The Drug Courts in NSW are established in order to take actions against the people who have an addiction towards the drugs. These people are presented in Court and are sometimes punished or sent to medical facilities to reduce their addiction. This report is created to discuss the fact that Drug Courts are not that effective towards the Drug adductors in terms of the health of participants, justice, etc. How Drug Courts s are not effective It is a fact that Drug Courts s in NSW held up a progressive alternative to incarceration for the drug crimes, however, they do not decrease criminal justice involved in fact they actually make the system more punitive towards the drug addiction in terms of drug offenders. They also raise the significant constitutional and privacy concerns (Mitchell et al. 2012). In order to carry on with the process, the participants have to sign a waiver which makes them compliance to share the medical information related to substance abuse treatment to all the members that are involved in the Drug Courts team. Drug Courts not effective in terms of health Drug Courts s in NSW provides the participants with the service that they need but they often fail to live up to their promises. They inadequately access the needs of people and place them with inappropriate treatment (McPherson and Sauder 2013). Moreover, in a treatment setting, the relapse is also met with various intensive services, however, in the Drug Courts setting it is met with the temporary or permanent removal of the services which is very harmful to the health of the participants. Drug Courts not effective regards to cost In order to take part in the Drug Courts, it becomes costly for the participants who have spent a lot to come to the Courts and also hire a lawyer to represent those (Sheidow et al. 2012). The drug (Opioid) cost addiction savings for the participants in NSW are based on the assumed reductions in terms of the pre-trial detention and recidivism but it is unclear to what extent. Even if some of the drug (Opioid) cost addiction savings are initiated in the pre-trial, these savings do not matter when the program cost is accounted for which are always overlooked. The cost includes the drug test, incarceration for detoxification, net widening, etc. Drug Courts not effective in supervision of participation The Drug Courts might not be effective in terms of supervision as the monitoring is done but it is not that frequent. There is no option for the auditing for the drug offenders in NSW as after the justice of Court, everything is left for the third parties to monitor (Bruns et al. 2012). In some of the cases, due to poor treatment, people have been found to develop serious illness as the court prohibits the trial of new kind of medicines to decrease this addiction and continue with standard treatments which sometimes is not effective. Drug Courts not effective in influencing other states Due to the various pitfalls of the Drug Courts s in terms of the unreliability, less successful outcomes, limited access towards treatments, increase in costs, public safety and many more, the other states do not find it appropriate to take efforts in order to set-up a special court like NSW did for the drug offenders (Messina et al. 2012). The states will have to lay down different policies especially for the Drug Courts, find the judges, set up structures for the justice which is not yet effective. Drug Courts not effective in multi-disciplinary cooperation The Drug Courts in order to provide proper justice and handle a case require the participation from the different parties like the government, local police, participants, doctor, medical team, lawyers, etc. However, the collaboration between all of them in NSW is not yet established and no one is aware of their exact duty if the case arrives (Alarid et al. 2012). Drug Courts not effective in stopping re-offending It has also been analyzed that the Drug Courts s at NSW are not successful in stopping the offenders to re-offend (Guastaferro 2012). Once the punishment is given, there is no supervision in terms of the monitoring the treatment or to check whether the offender is actually taking the medicines to reduce the drug addiction. Sometimes, offenders get released soon and start using the drugs again. References Alarid, LF Montemayor, CD 2012, The effect of parental support on juvenile Drug Courts completion and post-program recidivism.Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,Vol. 10 no. (4), pp.354-369. Bruns, EJ, Pullmann, MD, Weathers, ES, Wirschem, ML Murphy, JK 2012, Effects of a multidisciplinary family treatment Drug Courts on child and family outcomes: Results of a quasi-experimental study.Child Maltreatment,Vol. 17 no. (3), pp.218-230. Guastaferro, WP 2012, Using the level of service inventory-revised to improve assessment and treatment in Drug Courts.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,Vol. 55 no. (5), pp.769-789. McPherson, CM Sauder, M 2013, Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a Drug Courts.Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol. 58 no. (2), pp.165-196. Messina, N, Calhoun, S, Warda, U, 2012. Gender-responsive Drug Courts treatment: A randomized controlled trial.Criminal justice and behaviour,Vol. 39 no. (12), pp.1539-1558. Mitchell, O, Wilson, DB, Eggers, A. MacKenzie, DL 2012, Assessing the effectiveness of Drug Courts s on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional Drug Courts s.Journal of Criminal Justice,Vol. 40 no. (1), pp.60-71. Sheidow, AJ, Jayawardhana, J, Bradford, WD, Henggeler, SW and Shapiro, SB, 2012. Money matters: Cost-effectiveness of Juvenile Drug Courts with and without evidence-based treatments.Journal of child adolescent substance abuse,Vol. 20 no. (1), pp.69-90.